Infamous Report post Posted June 17, 2006 which one is better Dreamweaver 8 or Dreamweaver mx 2004? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thordin Report post Posted June 17, 2006 WordPad ROFL, but true either. I quite enjoyed HomeSite 5 and now I'm very satisfied with DW8, so version 8 is my pick... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ttlanhil Report post Posted June 17, 2006 WordPadevil. if you want an editor without much ability, then notepad will do (but get the nt/xp version, that can handle files over 50-odd KB in size) if you're more serious, get a real editor, either one designed for web editing, or a general coding one (many of which will have html, css, even javascript support) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vwpro Report post Posted June 17, 2006 dreamweaver if u think its to hard to write the codes urself Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Knuckles Report post Posted June 18, 2006 I used to use Macromedia MX 2004. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LabRat Report post Posted June 18, 2006 Wordpad is ok, but real men use 42 49 4E 41 52 59* *Yeah I know ^.^ My vote is going to have to go with Notepad, nothing like "Created with Notepad" at the bottom of a site to show how 1337 you are. Dreamweaver et al are never going to be perfect, all they will create are generic and highly bloated sites, with 200KB html files, most of which will be DreamWeaver ad spam in the HTML. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
m_bee Report post Posted June 18, 2006 (edited) Errmmm, quanta, kate, emacs... ops, I forgot we were talking about windows... EDIT: forgot bluefish... a nice gtk editor. Edited June 18, 2006 by m_bee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thordin Report post Posted June 18, 2006 Well I use Dreamweaver only because I'm lazy of typing. I do not rely on its features, it just helps me writing with auto </> tags, tag insight, CSS editor and so on... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FeLkkU Report post Posted June 19, 2006 Hc, if you dont want polices knockin' on your door(I doubt youre gonna buy dreamweaver ), download notepad++ . Its good and...free. You can get it from sourceforge.net i.e., too lazy to find link though . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placid Report post Posted June 19, 2006 WordPad LMAO Personally I use VI when on GNU/Linux and Textpad when in Windows. However, Dreamweaver is the industry standard and a very impressive piece of software so any version would do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
m_bee Report post Posted June 19, 2006 Errrmm... Standard??? The only standards when coding html are described here: http://www.w3.org/ For me, impresive is how bloated is the html it can produce lol Learn html and use a text editor. It is like to compare C against Visual Basic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placid Report post Posted June 19, 2006 Errrmm... Standard??? The only standards when coding html are described here: http://www.w3.org/ For me, impresive is how bloated is the html it can produce lol Learn html and use a text editor. It is like to compare C against Visual Basic Yes, the standard amongst professional designers, not W3C standards (which governs the standards of the code, not the applications that produce it). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
m_bee Report post Posted June 19, 2006 (edited) Its the same, I doubt that autogenerated code can met any standard at all in a strict manner 100% of times. Handwriten code can. Anyway, of course, to acknowledge standards is only important if you care for the rest of users, and not just MSIE ones. And of course, if comercial standards are more important for you than html standard, then go along and use it. Almost no knowledge needed and fast development comes always at a price. Dont have a doubt. EDIT: And anyway, there is no perfect browser, so, annoyances will always exist in one or another, since they all have small differences in the way that they interpret things that are supposed to be part of any standard... The html legacy Edited June 19, 2006 by m_bee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bleuren Report post Posted June 20, 2006 WordPad Dude, I like notepad better than that program For some sexy art try Microsoft word 97 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vwpro Report post Posted June 20, 2006 <code> newbs </code> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Infamous Report post Posted June 20, 2006 <?php } echo "what do you mean? "; } ?> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dejan Report post Posted June 20, 2006 http://www.nvu.com Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Placid Report post Posted June 21, 2006 Its the same, I doubt that autogenerated code can met any standard at all in a strict manner 100% of times. Handwriten code can. Anyway, of course, to acknowledge standards is only important if you care for the rest of users, and not just MSIE ones. And of course, if comercial standards are more important for you than html standard, then go along and use it. Almost no knowledge needed and fast development comes always at a price. Dont have a doubt. EDIT: And anyway, there is no perfect browser, so, annoyances will always exist in one or another, since they all have small differences in the way that they interpret things that are supposed to be part of any standard... The html legacy You are completely missing my point. I don't need you to preach to me about w3c standards, i'm an enterprise Java developer by trade, I know this shit. By 'standards' I meant the most popular application used by professionals in the industry. Jeeze... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tony_p Report post Posted July 3, 2006 The last edition has improvements for databases, scripting languages, etc. Basially it has the same features, more or less, that a web developer will use. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vormavius Report post Posted July 31, 2006 (edited) debug test.com File not found -a 100 mov ah,09 mov dx,109 int 21 int 20 -e 109 64 65 62 75 67 20 72 6f 78 21 24 -rcx :14 -w -q c:\test debug rox! c:\ Edited July 31, 2006 by Vormavius Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tanyia Report post Posted July 31, 2006 (edited) Personally, I vote for ed. I mean, it *is* the standard, after all. As for Dreamweaver, I've used both, and didn't notice too much of a difference. They're both useful, if that's the kind of program that suits your needs. Edited July 31, 2006 by Tanyia Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chatterbug89 Report post Posted August 9, 2006 (edited) gone Edited January 16, 2021 by chatterbug89 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
