starscreamer Report post Posted November 20, 2011 Hi again I was thinkning also about all the un-used houses rooms ect in EL, and came up with this suggestion, Selling houses to Guilds. the guild could customise the 'look' of the house/building (in keping with the customise rule already in place), and implement there own rules ie PK map, no cooldown, no summ stone, no rosto, no drop ect (obviosly all coming at a price ) If giuldHQ has an active PK map outside it player trying to enter should be warned before hand (as the same way when you try to enter a PK map) Of course only 'un-used' buildings should be sold, so not taverns or general stores or the bigger castles with NPC's inside. I dont have a suggestion on prices though. Hope you like. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Affliction Report post Posted November 20, 2011 so your suggesting a miniature guild map... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
starscreamer Report post Posted November 20, 2011 In many respects yes. But bought/rented by guilds in game using EL GC making them more accesible to players ingame. Limiting the number of buildings to 1 a guild, i think it is a good idea i think it would greatly boost real PKing. Also would get rid of alot of ingame resources, if say you had to pay not just GC but specific items, for map 'perks' (no drop, A/D cap etc.) Plus most of the buildings (atleast on C1) serve no purpose (C2 buildings are good for hiding from lenny ) it would just be making use of what is already there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
revi Report post Posted November 21, 2011 So we get even more complaints about some guilds luring players into PK areas... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nathanstenzel Report post Posted November 22, 2011 I believe there was a plan for the distant future to allow people to build structures, barricades and such. The change of map structures at the beginning of the year was supposed to be a step closer to this. I imagine switching to the newer OpenGL version support (and discarding some older versions) is another step towards it. I do not know what is left though. Perhaps if you look for "city" and "mayor", you will find the thread(s). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites