Arnieman Report post Posted April 1, 2005 i would also like to see a REAL TOP 50 list...and see which players have the highest average of 9 skills. This will also give ppl a kick in the ass to raise their low lvls. I like that idea as well... wait, since you came up with it, wouldn't that be a "TOP 110010" list? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blodoks Report post Posted April 1, 2005 I like this idea, but there are players with high levels and 0 nexus too... A real top 50 players must consider levels and nexus. Blodoks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Creepin_Death Report post Posted April 1, 2005 I like this idea, but there are players with high levels and 0 nexus too...A real top 50 players must consider levels and nexus. Blodoks The only problem if you go there why not include the perks and pretty soon your looking at what they have in the inv. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghrae Report post Posted April 1, 2005 i would also like to see a REAL TOP 50 list...and see which players have the highest average of 9 skills. This will also give ppl a kick in the ass to raise their low lvls. Actually, on our guild site, I keep track of the "average" of levels. It doesn't work quite the way you might think. I have players with three zeros in skills who still have a higher average than me b/c their Att / Def / Alch are so high. I'm not complaining, but without distributed mean way of calculating that, you'll probably find the Don Pedro's of EL still on the top of the chart. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crannog Report post Posted April 1, 2005 i worked out that Don is not that far ahead of me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scafativ Report post Posted April 1, 2005 (edited) I want to point out that Chintan explained himself perfectly the first time, and all of you who first claimed that it was pointless/unworkable/dumb, and then said "oooh... is THAT what you meant" are simply guilty of not having thought it through the first time. Chintan, you are guilty of nothing but clarity and brevity. Also- I really like the idea, as well as crannog's idea of an average list- perhaps both can be added. scafativ Edited April 1, 2005 by scafativ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghrae Report post Posted April 1, 2005 Well, if an idea is not explained clearly enough for others to understand, then are we wrong for not understanding? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leeloo Report post Posted April 1, 2005 I want to point out that Chintan explained himself perfectly the first time, It WAS explained clearly enough. People just need to learn to read. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghrae Report post Posted April 1, 2005 I would like to thank you for beginning to turn this topic into a flame section. Perhaps, just perhaps, we can all be happy that we all understand what Chintan's original thought was and not badger other players for not understanding. I think it's called empathy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaNora Report post Posted April 1, 2005 is there a way to keep the bots off the list? <_< Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ghrae Report post Posted April 1, 2005 Well the bots don't have any skills in most cases I think. But even if they did, I'm sure that someone could write a filter that would keep them removed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaNora Report post Posted April 2, 2005 that would be cool and i think the idea of it is good too altho i, personally, would have no idea how to do that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
