Lachesis

witch

You get them back by gaining experience again and by increasing your overall level step by step until it reaches its original level. That means you have to work harder the higher your overall level was before reset. If you got all your pickpoints back at once, you could switch your perks, attributes and nexuses anytime, which is not the intended use. Plan how to use your pickpoints and choose wisely, and reset only if you messed it all up horribly.

caries

AFAIK, you lose attributes and nexuses, but you keep your skill levels. Sincerely yours / Lachesis

java

error

faith

gate

:lol: Großartig! Englisch scheint er jedenfalls auch nicht sonderlich zu mögen.

crawl

lose

role playing

distraction

Normal imprecision, due to rounding errors :lol: That's not normal. Even if they calculated 70/140 at single precision with a formula that calculates 1/140 and then multiplies it with 7000 (%), the result should be far more precise. However, if you try to subtract 0.5 from the number of votes given for each option, but keep the total number of votes as it is, you get very close to the results that are shown up in the poll. As adding 0.5 is a frequent way to implement rounding if you only have a ceiling function, I guess that there is probably something wrong with the rounding implementation. Sincerely yours Lachesis

"Ich hoffe, du wirst eine Antwort auf Englisch lesen können, da mein Deutsch nicht ausreicht, auch nur zu versuchen es in dieser Sprache zu sagen. Öffne deinen Rucksack (inventory), indem du das Sack-Symbol anklickst. Dann klicke auf die Waffe in deinem Rucksack (achte auf einen Mauszeiger in Form einer offenen Hand, evtl. rechts klicken den Mauszeiger wechseln -- Anm. d. Üb.) und ziehe sie in den Block aus acht Kacheln auf der rechten Seite des Fensters." Sincerely Yours / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Lachesis EDIT: In einem anderen Thread kündigt Roja ein mehrsprachiges Forum an.

Kyoto

Lachesis shivered, overwhelmed by the by the feeling of her heart being clasped by sharp pliers. She vacantly watched a boar gorging the last remains of the tomatoes she had been about to harvest. "This is a scary world", the young elf pondered, looking at the fields of Mynadar bluring behind curtains of rain. "For a split second, I felt as if all the life would have been captured behind a wall of glass and pain ... That depressing endless tempest will drive me mad some day.", she pushed her thoughts away. "I need to finish those potions, Brim is waiting for them." That way marking the path for the next hours and days she headed back to the City of Mynadar. Neither she knew about any of the evil things that were happening on the continent and the seas of seridia, nor in what way her name connected her to them.

Hi :-) As far as I remember, there was announced a smaller meeting with those who wanted to contribute for yesterday. Time and place was said to be announced here. Well, I still can't find any information about it in this forum :-) What happened to those plans? Thank you for any information Sincerely yours, Lachesis

Thank you again, necroman Did you get my PM?

Well, dont get me wrong, but ... isn't there something wrong with the calculator :0)

Potion of Reasoning increases your basic (persistent) reasoning points by 5. Those then start do decrease by one each minute until they reach that basic value value again. This means they decrease everytime a minute of the game clock completes, which means the interval to the first decrease might be actually shorter, depending on the exact time when you drank the potion. Also, if you are researching, the decrease by 1 will be done *before* the number of pages (research points) you finished are calculated, thus your researching benefit will be *4* instead of 5 the first time. The effect is not cumulative, so if you drink another potion you will have base reasoning points + 5 again. Sincerely yours Lachesis

Moi, je trouve cette idee tres interessante. Faisons une categorie "internationale" avec des sous-categories en francais, polonais, danois, portugais et ainsi de suite. Le seul problem avec cela est trouver des moderateurs pour ces forums. I find this an interesting idea. Let's make an "international" category with subcategories in French, Polish, Danish, Portuguese and so on. The only problem with this is finding moderators for these forums.

Oops, yes I got that point :0) I think it would be a good thing to both introduce a minimum interval between duels and restrict the duelling areas, because a) without the interval duelling areas might become too crowded without restricted areas storage areas might become more crowded -- you always have to adjust your inventory before you start a duel ... EDIT: The no weapon/ no potion a.s.o. problem might be overcome "easily" (in terms of UI simplicity, not dev complexity ) by a show-inventory/clothing feature, *maybe* upon another mutual agreement, similar to the checkboxes in trading window, maybe in a second window after a checkbox has been chosen. The advantage of this is that you don't need to care about all the various kinds of duel restrictions that players might invent, you can give them all the freedom they want at once Sincerely yours / Lachesis

Thank you thank you thank you for your lots of ideas, this is certainly going to be a very interesting thread Now again some of my thoughts: I think we all agree that it is sometimes hard (and sometimes not) to determine the true gender of some person if s/he is pretending it. Probably you will also agree that for every clue there is a counter-example and finally that the hardest task of all might be to expatiate clues. However, expatiating clues is all that qualitative research can do, and probably the most interesting part of this problem. As such, my intention was to focuse on it. So before we run into either argueing which are good clues and which are not, or even the desperate conclusion that there might be no good ones at all, let's spend some words on what a good clue might be: 1) it is concrete and objectively verifyable 2) it either 2a) applies to "nearly" all cases or 2b) applies to "nearly" all cases of a cleanly specified subgroup of cases whereas the closeness of "nearly all" to "all" defines a graduation of the clue's quality, but also the degree of concreteness of its formulation and exactness the subgroup specification do. Well this sounds a little scientific but it wasn't really meant to be , and it is also just a proposal, of course. Please consider this to be a little fingerpost on where we *might* lead this discussion. I am looking forward to your additional ideas And for joy, after all that has been said, guess (unless you know it!) my cute analytical mind's gender ... and please excuse my possibly awful grammar With regards, Lachesis

Well, just as easy as it is to leave out or add an f and an e in front of "male" in an answer to that question What I would be interested in is how to provide evidence (imagine the case someone doesn't believe you). This is rather meant to be a theoretical discussion <_< The first person to ask me that question was Roja... Entropy, is there something you didn't tell us? He he, I rather meant something like I was asked that about ten times in the same converstion with the same person, though I gave a concrete answer at once <_< EDIT: quoting corrected