Gnome

YAY more errors!!! I don't get this one though, heres the error log. nvidia-installer log file '/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' creation time: Mon Oct 25 09:20:13 2004 option status: license pre-accepted : false update : false force update : false expert : false uninstall : false driver info : false no precompiled interface: false no ncurses color : false query latest driver ver : false OpenGL header files : false no questions : false silent : false X install prefix : /usr/X11R6 OpenGL install prefix : /usr Installer install prefix: /usr kernel source path : (not specified) kernel install path : (not specified) proc mount point : /proc ui : (not specified) tmpdir : /tmp ftp site : ftp://download.nvidia.com Using: nvidia-installer ncurses user interface -> License accepted. -> No precompiled kernel interface was found to match your kernel; would you li ke the installer to attempt to download a kernel interface for your kernel f rom the NVIDIA ftp site (ftp://download.nvidia.com)? (Answer: Yes) -> No matching precompiled kernel interface was found on the NVIDIA ftp site; this means that the installer will need to compile a kernel interface for your kernel. -> Kernel source path: '/lib/modules/2.6.8.1-10mdk/build' -> Performing cc_version_check with CC="cc". -> Performing rivafb check. -> Performing rivafb module check. WARNING: Your kernel was configured to include rivafb support as a loadable kernel module. The rivafb driver conflicts with the NVIDIA driver; the NVIDIA kernel module will still be built and installed, but be aware that the NVIDIA driver will not be able to function properly if the rivafb module is loaded! -> Cleaning kernel module build directory. executing: 'cd ./usr/src/nv; make clean'... rm -f -f nv.o os-agp.o os-interface.o os-registry.o nv.o os-agp.o os-interfa ce.o os-registry.o nvidia.mod.o rm -f -f build-in.o nv-linux.o *.d .*.{cmd,flags} rm -f -f nvidia.{o,ko,mod.{o,c}} nv_compiler.h *~ -> Building kernel module: executing: 'cd ./usr/src/nv; make module SYSSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.8.1-10mdk/b uild SYSOUT=/lib/modules/2.6.8.1-10mdk/build'... Your kernel was configured to include rivafb support as a loadable kernel module. The rivafb driver conflicts with the NVIDIA driver; the NVIDIA kernel module will still be built and installed, but be aware that the NVIDIA driver will not be able to function properly if the rivafb module is loaded! *** Failed rivafb module sanity check, but continuing! *** NVIDIA: calling KBUILD... make -C /lib/modules/2.6.8.1-10mdk/build \ KBUILD_SRC=/usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-10mdk KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 \ KBUILD_CHECK= KBUILD_EXTMOD="/tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/ usr/src/nv" \ -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-10mdk/Makefile modules mkdir -p /tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/.tmp_vers ions make -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-10mdk/scripts/Makefile.build obj=/tmp/selfgz5 147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv echo \#define NV_COMPILER \"`cc -v 2>&1 | tail -n 1`\" > /tmp/selfgz5147/NVI DIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv_compiler.h cc -Wp,-MD,/tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/.nv.o .d -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Iinclude2 -I/usr/s rc/linux-2.6.8.1-10mdk/include -I/tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111- pkg1/usr/src/nv -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasin g -fno-common -pipe -msoft-float -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-unit-at-a -time -march=i686 -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-10mdk/include/asm-i386/mach-defau lt -Iinclude/asm-i386/mach-default -O2 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/tmp /selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv -Wall -Wimplicit -Wret urn-type -Wswitch -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith - Wno-multichar -Werror -O -fno-common -MD -Wno-cast-qual -Wno-error -D_LOOSE_ KERNEL_NAMES -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DNTRM -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LOOSE_KERNEL_NAME S -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DNV_MAJOR_VERSION=1 -DNV_MINOR_VERSION=0 -DNV_PATCH LEVEL=6111 -DNV_UNIX -DNV_LINUX -DNV_INT64_OK -DNVCPU_X86 -UDEBUG -U_DEBUG - DNDEBUG -DNV_CHANGE_PAGE_ATTR_PRESENT -DNV_CLASS_SIMPLE_PRESENT -DMODULE -DK BUILD_B ASENAME=nv -DKBUILD_MODNAME=nvidia -c -o /tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1. 0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv.o /tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/u sr/src/nv/nv.c /tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv.c: In function `nv_acpi_event': /tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv.c:3697: error: `PM_SAVE_STATE' undeclared (first use in this function) /tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv.c:3697: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv.c:3697: error: for each function it appears in.) make[4]: *** [/tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv.o ] Error 1 make[3]: *** [_module_/tmp/selfgz5147/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6111-pkg1/usr/src /nv] Error 2 make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2 NVIDIA: left KBUILD. nvidia.ko failed to build! make[1]: *** [module] Error 1 make: *** [module] Error 2 -> Error. ERROR: Unable to build the NVIDIA kernel module. ERROR: Installation has failed. Please see the file '/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details. You may find suggestions on fixing installation problems in the README available on the Linux driver download page at www.nvidia.com.

Seems to have worked..no dependency errors so I am going to try this install again. Thanks everyone also

theres /usr/src/rpm/rpms which contains the dirs athlon, i386, i486, i586, i686, k6, and noarch When I open any of these they are empty. I'm using Mandrakelinux 10.1

I downloaded the IA32 one. When I installed I get: ERROR Unable to find the kernel source tree for currently running kernel. Please make sure you have installed the kernel source files for your kernel; on Red Hat Linux systems, for example, be sure you have the kernel-source rpm installed. If you know the correct kernel source files are installed, you may specify the kernel source path with the '--kernel-source-path' commandline option.

OK another question. For the drivers it says IA32 and IA64, both linux. Theres an AMD64 to so I'm thinking this has something to do with my processor or is that for the chipset?

Great it works. Thanks guys. I think I'm going to like linux, at least I know what my computer is doing. Now to get the driver for my gcard...I'm at 0 fps

oops forgot the ldconfig one min then...

K I editted it but when I try to open el I get the same error message (first one)

Getting this... "ld.so.conf" "ld.so.conf" E212: Can't open file for writing Hit ENTER or type command to continue

Ok i used the recover thing and got it back..edited and pressed esc then enter then :x and now I have this include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/lib/qt3/lib /usr/local/lib ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E45: 'readonly' option is set (add ! to override) 4,14 All

Well in my panic when this happened I closed the terminal..now I'm getting this when I try to edit it E325: ATTENTION Found a swap file by the name ".ld.so.conf.swp" owned by: root dated: Mon Oct 25 06:25:06 2004 file name: /etc/ld.so.conf modified: YES user name: root host name: localhost process ID: 4514 While opening file "ld.so.conf" dated: Sat Oct 23 21:49:41 2004 (1) Another program may be editing the same file. If this is the case, be careful not to end up with two different instances of the same file when making changes. Quit, or continue with caution. (2) An edit session for this file crashed. If this is the case, use ":recover" or "vim -r ld.so.conf" to recover the changes (see ":help recovery"). If you did this already, delete the swap file ".ld.so.conf.swp" to avoid this message. Swap file ".ld.so.conf.swp" already exists!

O shit..I got into that editor, tried to type something and half of it vanished edit: forgot to press i

How do I open it from the terminal?

Yes, I moved it back. The file ld.so.conf says its read only when I open it in a text editor though...

It is a read only..

Ok I'm gunna put it back and listen to you

[root@localhost lib]# ls -l libopenal* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 830462 Oct 25 03:13 libopenal.a* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Oct 25 03:13 libopenal.so -> /usr/local/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.7* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Oct 25 03:13 libopenal.so.0 -> /usr/local/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.7* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 543858 Oct 25 03:13 libopenal.so.0.0.7* At least I know it exists now Would I just move these to /lib then? [EDIT] Moved it to /lib and it works now 0 fps though...I'm going to get a driver for my vid card (read chatters post and glad I have an NVIDIA)

Turn up your gamma

As I said in my reply in Ents post, It is your (ents) game. There's a lot of people whos lives (including mine) revolve around this game. For the people who don't accept the change: The game is BETA, change is a part of further developing the game and has to happen. Whether you like it or not, it is a priviledge, not a right that you are able to play this game for FREE. People are taking for granted what they have been GIVEN. Ent, just reconsider. Take the time off or leave if that is what you want to do. I just thank you [and others] for this game and wish you the best of luck for whatever you choose to do. [EDIT] I know I have more to say, just don't know how to put it. Oh yea, and for any one whos thinking about bitching about anything....just stop and stfu before you cause more trouble. <_<

Flogging? But yea point taken...

True, probably about a good half the population of EL would be gone, but I wonder to myself would it be any Big loss? Hmm... Nope Not in my oppion Not in mine either

Neoses that is a very radical yet logical solution. Anyone who bitches about changes like the harvesting should not have the priviledge to play such a great game.

Umm Ent. Fuck them. It's your game and if you want to make changes and some ungrateful people can't deal with it they don't deserve to play. I for one believe this game will fall apart w/o you. Just stay please

You don't just get banned for no reason. I don't understand why people that have been banned are always so mad. There's a reason why it happened, just ask nicely and I'm sure the response would be much better.

lmao. Sry shy I was afk again. Go ahead and pm me again and I will be there. [EDIT] Errr..pm me tomorrow then