SitDownAtStorag

Watch your tone. Not looking for problems. I simply said I don't see how rules were broken - and I still don't. Muling is not enticing ppl onto a pk map with a secondary char - no matter how much a mod tries to stretch this rule. However - as I have said - this is simply my opinion - take it or leave it - but DON'T acccuse me of looking for problems.

Er. what muling? See the following...

Er, cos it's not against the rules? (if they,re not newbs)

IMO this is one of those 'general rules' found in life that is used when you want to get at someone but there isn't any other way to do it. Don't agree? Then why doesn't scamming, bag jumping, etc fall under the catch all nature of this rule? Having a character to entice other characters into a pk area isn't against the rules as far as I can tell (as long as they're not newbs). But like I say, just my opinion.

Mule noobs? I thought muling was when you had a second character interact with your other character to carry stuff?! Borders? Is it illegal or not? What rule is that? Not being funny - genuinely curious!

Lol!

Er, is the character a mule? I'm not sure tricking ppl to go into dangerous places is muling, rather it might be scamming. And could he be banned if he didn't mule? Unless he was trying to trick newbs, I'm not sure he qualifies for a ban. IMO M_B did the right thing to post this, but I'm not sure the mods should have banned him. Unless there are other things going on of which we are unaware? Yes, he us obviously an outlaw, and a stupid one at that, but I don't see how he actually broke any rules.

_A_... there is nothing wrong with anyone's views, including yours! People can agree or disagree. It's just a shame that people don't know how to disagree without being insulting! There seems to be a LOT of that in the forums. I don't know why people think it's ok to be rude/insulting, just because they have a different opinion.

People don't. People have problems with equating all crimes of theft as the same. Er, no, what you said was: clearly you dont understand the word principle...please look it up in a dictionary before replying. Notice the bit in bold? Thats insulting. I'm a newbie myself. And I notice - you STILL havent addressed my point about the core issue.

.... ARE insults. according to you, if I said 'I happen to think you have no idea what you are talking about and need to think about what you are saying before replying', this wouldn't be an insult. I happen to think it is, so I won't say it. You just cannot bring yourself to answer my question or debate the issue can you? Hence my repetition. The gist of all your posts directed at me are: I need to read a dictionary and I don't understand. The gist of my posts directed at you is a legitimate issue about the root point of this thread. See a difference here? Cos I do. According to you, someone who takes a bag with 1 veg is behaving the same way as a person who takes a bag with a tit serp. The contents of the bag DO reflect the severity of the crime. My question isn't rhetorical, it is a valid point that you won't respond to.

End of? Nope - it ain't. My original points still stand. As do my questions which I notice you havent answered. Is there a need for such a remark? Have I insulted you? No. Why do you want to turn this into a flame thread? As I already said.... I have noticed that ppl who are so eager to complain about supposed crimes, etc, are the first to resort to insults and name calling. Weird huh? Thank you for proving my point. And to repeat: As for contents of bag reflecting the severity of the crime... ask yourself would you ever leave a tit serp in a bag? And ask yourself, if someone takes a bag with 1 veg is it the same as 100 veg, a 1000 veg, a tit serp?

End of? Not quite.... Er, what crime? He didnt commit a crime. And please don't comment on my right to post my point of view. I am entitled, and was respectful. I have noticed that ppl who are so eager to complain about supposed crimes, etc, are the first to resort to insults and name calling. Weird huh? As for contents of bag reflecting the severity of the crime... ask yourself would you ever leave a tit serp in a bag? And ask yourself, if someone takes a bag with 1 veg is it the same as 100 veg, a 1000 veg, a tit serp?

Indeed I will comment! While Kala was too strong to say 'you obviously haven't a clue' (showing her usual charm bypass ), I do agree with her view on the contents of the bag reflect the severity of the crime. To be pissed off at a bag of fruit, newbie or not, seems a bit extreme. What would you be more annoyed with having stolen, bag of fruit or tit serp? It you say they are the same, then maybe I could swap some of my fruit and veg for any decent waepons you might have?

English, Australian, American (fluent with the exception of some unusual slang - alooominum?), Irish, Scottish. 5 Languages.

I thought we moved on from that. AFK = OK! AFK at storage/heavily populated areas = BAD! The discussion now is what would be the ideal way to deal with those who AFK at BUSY AREAS ONLY!