-MrGray-

Lately I've been bidding on some auctions but I've seen that me and some other players are struck by "I'll not sell if I don't like the price" thing. This is not a whining post that "omfg I didn't get the item". I totally respect that people should be able to sell their stuff at the price they want but this is why we have starting prices in my opinion. Just as an example, I've auctioned a Rapier of Death on forums (and I see no problem saying it here as it is already sold) with starting price of 170k and BIN of 500k. Starting price was 170k because that was the lowest price I could accept for it.Letting people know the lowest price I could accept saved both mine and bidders time and trouble of endless bids resulting in no item. So I'm actually saying that if you have an idea of what you want for the item you auction(most people has that idea as not much priceless items are around anymore), set a starting price and make it a decent auction. I, of course, would like to hear opinions about this. MrGray.

They both are good I guess and they have diffrent uses but it seem to work better to have them balanced. Well Vitality adds mana but If you think it is irrevelent then you'd be wrong.As a fighter there will be times that you will need every single mana of yours.

Well some people may want to keep their trades private but you may never know if it is abused by seller or not. Also the main problem is the auctions end up with no trade because seller didn't like the price.This thing just shouldn't happen like "I won't sell because I don't like the winner price". A winner is winner you have to sell to the winner but to protect sellers right to get the price they want as minimum, the sellers should just set a starting bid which would be the minimum price acceptable for the item they are selling. This will make sure that they get what they want and buyers get what they want.This also will provide some (not full of course) protection from stupid fake bidders that just enjoy the pump prices up.

That might be fixed with a rule like auction will end if no new bids in two days or something and I agree with Lexi on private bidders, it can easily be abused.

70k

50k

Invasion was awesome, so was the strategic problem I encountered. Great fun. Thanks Usl.

SOLD.

120k

110k

Ingame name: MrGray I'd like to order 50k Diamonds 170kgc

Emerald Claymore of Life and Mana - Like an Emerald Claymore, but +30 Mana and Life Weight: 20 EMU A great piece for collectors and looks QUITE rare if not the only.Also your chance to have highest HP possible on game. Starting bid: 200k BIN: Might be discussed in PM. 10k for increase. End of auction is when it seems like we are not having bids anymore for like 2-3 days. I'll assess the final offer. MrGray ingame.

.

Edit: Webserver of EL had problems and page was not reachable for quite some time. So end time is set to 7th of October 6pm GMT. Another edit: Damned calender was broken and stayed at 5th so I tried to mean 7th. So sorry for it.

Go away kad

I forgot to set increase amount so offer taken this time but I'll appriciate person who bids next bids 220k at least.

That's exactly my point. You already decided it is a bug. You didn't ask: Is it a bug? You asked: Why isn't it a bug? We didn't ask "Is it a bug?" because we know that it is not stated as a bug by you so it is not a bug. As you don't see it as a bug, we asked for a detailed explanation of the official thought which is your thought.

We didn't make a judgement on it if it is bug abusing or not, we just asked more explanation about it not being a bug.

I mean come on it is right in most cases but do we not even own the bag of monster we fought from full hp to death w/o disengaging and when the killer is the person supposed the be one to get to the bag first...Sorry but "No one owns a bag" shouldn't go this further.

Well I don't understand how it is not the question on the first post but still let that go and wait for Ent's answer.

We know it isn't a bug, eventhough we think so which obiviously doesn't matter, we are asking how come it is not bug. If it is not a bug, it is feature of the game and then there is a problem with that people stealing anothers bags and it is not like normal bagjumping (leave a stuff on the ground and expect it not to be taken) it is taken eventhough fighter fights it all the way down and bagjumper doesn't even damage the monster and that being a game feature.

Quesar already seen what you are saying, he is, and we all, shortly saying "It isn't a rule break and he is not punished and we all get it but why it is not a bug?"

Topic is not really Morath, it is how this thing is NOT a bug. Thats what we all wonder.

Maybe "use a gatherer and problem solved" but still one must not be forced to use gatherer to get a bag s/he clearly owns by fighting it all the way to death. Gatherer med is, or at least should be, to pick up drops smoother not to help you to get your own bag from hands of a bagjumper.

Yes, I have been in quite some Castellan teams and he is always around trying to bagjump I'!d love to hear how he does that staying in rules because the tanker never leaves the Castellan so he should be getting to walk on the bag right...I'd love to hear the explanation too.